David Thomas- The Mind Of A Man Essay

During persuasive writing pieces authors evaluate to make you see their shoot of view as valid. Often clock during this process, their writing is compromised by the errors they make to turf out their station. David doubting doubting Thomas makes some(prenominal) errors in his examine The Mind of a Man. In his thesis he tries to dig up that women are non smarter than men as previously retrieved, but sooner that they plainly excel at different tasks. However, throughout his whole rise, he describes that boys are discouraged by female teachers and does non stick to his thesis. He launched a biased luff of view that he supported with however anecdotical certainty and studies that contained no numbers or statistics. Also, his use of sensation in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his.David Thomas takes a biased steer of view in his essay. Throughout many parts of the essay he describes the stereotypes intimately boys, stating their diffic ulty to learn properly as a impart of these stereotypes by often using anecdotal evidence. He describes the lower grades boys were getting than girls on the GCSE exams and makes the assumption, The introduction of course work into the GCSE syllabus appears to favor girls, who play to be diligent and less(prenominal) rebellious, which has not been proven, or could not be backed up by any sort of statistical or factual information from studies. He makes this averment assuming that the reason must be that girls receive higher grades because the test favored them. He does not take into the consideration that maybe the boys simply didnt do as well for a number of other reasons that has nothing to do with the authority the tests were designed.In the essay, he continues to show his biased point of view by quoting Tony Mooney, a secondary coach headmaster, who reinforces his point verbalise boys are less advanced than girls because women teachers favor girls and do not reinforce bo ys because of their aggressive and ferocious behavior. Thomas adds this quote that has no factual evidence, it is the opinion of a school headmaster, who surely cannot be present everyday in every ace class to know everything thats going on. Thomas quotes Mooneys son, who showed a difference in his marks when taught by a woman, Because the men teachers never shout at me as much as the woman teachers is another(prenominal) form of anecdotal evidence. This is the feeling of one little boy who cannot be compared to society as a whole (222).Thomas continues to try and prove his point by adding studies without any statistics in them and in turn makes many contradictions to things previously mentioned in his essay. He includes a study done at the University of California in which 72 boys and 60 girls at kindergarten level intentional how to read with a machine. When tested, the girls scores were less than the boys scores. Then, when they went back to normal steering by women teachers, they were tested again later and the boys scored less than the girls.As interest as these results may be, they do not contain numbers to show how large the difference actually was. The difference could be minimal which could be due to a number of reasons. So, the fact that no statistical evidence was included with the study did not prove to be that convincing (223). Also, in the beginning of the essay, he states that women defend been proven to be better at verbal tasks, which would explain the reason why they didnt do as well with the machines as the teachers. So he contradicts himself entering this study by previously showing why a girl might become done better on these tests (221).Thomas uses a lot of sense in his essay to prove his point, specifically when he talks about the quote he used from Christine Cosker who seemed to disprove one of his earlier quotes by Mooney. She said, If girls achieve higher standards than boys, it is not the result of sympathetic female teachers it is that boys decompose to be motivated because of their attitude to women. Boys early mother is almost entirely one of a society which regards womens traditionalistic utilisations as trivial, dull and second-rate and dismisses their opinions. If girls have a positive role model in the female teacher, they will do better than boys. besides if boys, unencumbered by societys prejudices, valued their female teachers, thence their progress would match that of girls(223). Obviously Cosker felt strongly about her point and proved an alternative explanation to Mooneys as well as Thomas theory of female teachers being the cause of the boys lower grades. Thomas uses jeering as well to make his anger known.In reaction to her letter, he states Heaven forbid that they boys should be given any consideration or compassion. Heaven forbid that the prejudices of the new(a) age should be challenged. If you ever doubted that feminists have taken over fromapoplectic old colonels as the great r eactionaries of society, effective read this letter(224). If you read between the lines of his sarcasm, you begin to see just what he is implying. He is implying that she didnt give boys any compassion or consideration when she was simply stating that if the boys learned to appreciate their teachers more and see them as more of a role model it would work towards their advantage. He continues to approach path her different point of view by stating them as a feminists point of view. In his efforts to try to make people take his side and believe his thoughts he just discredits himself because instead of embracing the possibility of other causes he simply knocks them down and states that they are just plain and simply wrong.Thomas body paragraphs and cobblers last were not connected substantially to the main point of his essay. In his thesis, he used a quote from Dr. John Nicholson saying that the IQ scores from men and women were indistinguishable (221), and the only difference is t hat they were just better at different sort of tasks. Meanwhile, his whole entire essay attacked the fact that female teachers dont support the boys and that caused their lower grades. So the information he provided did not support his thesis.Also he ends the finish with a strange statement that seem to signify a new thesis. His reason sentence, When Yoda sat on his rock in The Empire Strikes sand and told Luke Skywalker that he had to choose between the dark force and the light, he knew what he was talking about (225), seemed to make little sense and had nothing to do with his essay. In writing his essay, he shouldve considered his audience and that some people who did not see the movie would not understand what he was implying, besides that statement seemed more like an opening line rather than a concluding one.In order for authors to make you see their point of view as valid, they sometimes compromise the strength of their information. David Thomas did many things to compromis e his credibility in his essay The Mind of a Man. In Thomas essay he had a biased view that he supported with anecdotal evidence. He used studies with no real number or statistics to asseverate them. His use of emotion in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his. Also, his body paragraphs and conclusion didnt seem to beconnected to the initial thesis he stated.