Hate Crimes Should NOT be Punished Differently than Other Crimes Essay

abominate Crimes Should NOT be Punished Differently than Other Crimes Hate crimes should non be punished differently than other crimes. The actual crime should be punished, not the reasoning behind it. The idea of lowering crimes differently ground on victims might make w nauseatever people or groups flavour that others are more(prenominal) protected or valued than they are. The concept of tough crimes differently because of motive is senseless, unnecessary, and an injustice. Again, the actual crime should be punished not the reasoning behind it. Murder is murder, robbery is robbery, rape is rape, regardless of motive. For example, somebody A and Person B both assault innocent people. besides while beating the life out of his victim, Person B calls him a Nigger. His crime is considered a detest crime. Consequently, his crime will receive harsher punishment. despite why the crime took place, the point is that a crime took place. No proposition why the victim is cho sen, he or she was still harmed, the family is still way out to grieve, and someone must be punished. Whether a person is killed for money or drugs or out of hate or prejudice, the fact still cadaver that he or she has been killed. With hate crime laws, the hate is being looked at, more so than the crime itself. Even though hate is a wicked thing to have in your heart, all Americans have the right to hate whatever or who ever they want. Besides, if officials start punishing hate or unholy thoughts, they might as well make a smart category of crime thought crime. If this line of thinking were acted upon, then half of America would be behind bars.As stated above, the idea of punishing crimes differently based on the victim might make some people or groups feel as if others are more prot... ...ce near committing a crime. But lawmakers failed to see that this is the point of any law. Look at how much crime this country has. That is part of the reason why galore(postnominal) stat es reinstated the death penaltybecause people were supposed to think twice or so committing crimes. Obviously, these laws are not doing their job. The government reported 97 executions this year alone, up from 68 in 1998 and 74 executions in 1997 (Johnson 1). Officials should rethink their strategies. If laws already live for a certain crime, regardless of whether or not it is a hate crime, then those laws should be used. Laws should not be changed to fit individual situations.In conclusion, hate crimes should be punished no differently than other crimes. The effect are the same. The crime is basically the same. The family experiences the same trauma and the punishment should be the same.