Is It True That Acting Quickly and Instinctively Is the Best Response to a Crisis Essay

A world who waits to believe in carry through before moulding is anything you like, but he is non a man of legal action. It is as if a tennis worker before returning the ball stopped to think about his views of the visible and mental advantages of tennis. You must act as you breathe. Georges Clemenceau Is it true that acting promptly and instinctively is the best response to a crisis? Or are in that location times when an urgent situation requires a more careful musing and a slower response?Differentiating circumstances determine the best cross of action to take whether it is a carefully constructed and slower response or a quick instinctive reaction to a crisis it all depends on the level of urgency and time and resources available. Literature and history have sh suffer how incompatible responses may have a positive or negative outcome. Events of the ult illustrate what type of response is the best for certain situations such as the carrying out cardiopulmonary resusci tation or the planned escape of Romeo and Juliet in the lend Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare or the response to the Statess division in 1860 over the possession of African American slaves resulting in the American civilised War of 1861-1865.Situations which may determine life or death with a very short time span available always make a quick, urgent and instinctive response. A response like unrivaled to perform CPR on a stranger suffering a cardiac arrest, this response is initiated by the natural human instinct to defend and save anothers life. An urgent situation such as this one has only one response method and that is one of action as acclaimed by Georges Clemenceau as every second wasted adds to the orifice of death of the patient.Many situations especially those involving relationships need an objectively assessed response planned, a response with an absence of subjective emotion. The play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare exemplifies this notion. The two l overs act passionately out of emotion and adoration for the other that they do not fully consider the outcomes and results of their actions. In this scenario either an objective observer or a rational decision from an insider needs to occur to determine their paths of action. Because they some(prenominal)(prenominal) acted irrationally and emotionally influenced it resulted in the eventual heartbreaking demise of both Romeo and Juliet.History proves the embody the ideals of planned responses as a course of action to an urgent situation like one of divided nationalism and future anarchy. Close to the start of the American Civil War in 1861, America was divided between the southern states defending their right to slavery of African Americans and the rest of the country. The southern states in general rebelled against Lincolns leaders and denied his authority over them leading to imminent anarchy that he was force to go to war in order to reassert that authority and lead and unite the country. Up until this present daylight it is still debatable whether he should or should not have gone to war but it opens up the questions and the possibilities of a calmer planned response.The atrocities of the American Civil War shed glisten on the ideals of a slower planned reaction to the crisis. However it is undisputable that either response, instinctive or planned, would have both effective and deleterious effects on the country but to what extent is the question. History, literature and day to day tales of crises and solutions have taught us that the time of response to a mischance required is entirely dependent on that certain circumstance and its own level of urgency and time and resources accessible.