Social Classes Of The 19th Century Sociology Essay

Social Classes Of The 19th Century Sociology EssayWhat would it be handle to get in a world where everyone is put into separate groups establish on nothing more than gender, what family you were born(p) into and how much money you make (Victorian England An instauration 3-4)? Theories of genial clear up were not fully recognized until the nineteenth vitamin C from that point forward the idea of affable correctes has been discussed by many famous philosophers and theorists (Social Class 1). In England, long before the Victorian Age, Aethelberht set down a code of laws known today as brotherly distinguish (United Kingdom 1). In many parts of the world throughout history social kinspersones have been commonly broken down into three groups, but in the British Empire of 1814 there were as many as eight (Jane Austens beingness 1-2). Social groups were usually divided by raceway and stereotypical by gender (Turpin 1). One of the most common means of dividing plurality into so cial level is financial income (Scott 2). All social groupings regardless of location and era argon based to nearly distributor point upon gender, kinship and economic status.The history of social consort in England began before England was even a countrified when Aethelberht reigned over the Anglo-Saxons (United Kingdom 1). He set down a code of laws where the most important draw together was kinship every freeman depended on his kin for protection (United Kingdom 1). Since then philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau further elaborated on the idea by discussing the issues of social inequality and stratification (Social Class 1). These ideas were youthfulr passed on to Henri de Saint-Simon, who put forth the argu handst that a states form of government corresponds to the system of rules of economic production (Social Class 1). Later his successors introduced the theory of the proletariat, or working mob, as a major political force, which greatly influenced the development of Karl Marxs theory of class, which has dominated later discussions of the topic (Social Class 1).Social class has been divided into three different groups in many countries and governments throughout history (Victorian England An Introduction 3). Those three are usually upper, middle and lower or working class (Victorian England An Introduction 2). The upper class in the Victorian Age were the royalty, lords spiritual and temporal and great officers of state many of whom did not work and true most of their wealth from there inheritance (Victorian England An Introduction 4 and Jane Austens world 1). Middle class men did most of the white collar work such as business, vocation, and politics they were give monthly or annually (Victorian England An Introduction 4). Now, last and unfortunately least, the lower class men and women did the physical labor and were paid daily or weekly wages (Victorian England An Introduction 3). Men and women were al so separated in purchase order (Victorian England An Introduction 4). The women were assigned the private sphere and the men were assigned the public sphere of business and commerce (Victorian England An Introduction 4).A majority of the time there are three social groups but some have found there to be up to eight particularized groups in England during the nineteenth century (Jane Austens World 1-2). There were the highest orders which are put into the generic upper class of royalty and the rich, the second class which seems to be a mix between the upper and the middle class in that they are reputable but not of royal blood (Jane Austens World 1). Also the third class which contained the doctors, clergy and merchants which can be put into the middle class, the fourth class consists of many of the same people as the third class just on a lesser scale (Jane Austens World 1). Fifth class is where the shopkeepers were placed along with the publicans and people with miscellaneous oc cupations (Jane Austens World 1). The sixth class is where the lower or working class of people are found (Jane Austens World 2). Members of this class included working mechanics, artists, craftsmen and farmers or agricultural laborers (Jane Austens World). The people that were in the seventh group were either a paupers, vagrants, gypsies and criminals (Jane Austens World 2). The army and the navy had their own social class, which includes officers, soldiers, marines and pensioners (Jane Austens World 2).Economic status also played a big part in the development of the social classes because of the economy the people were grouped by their income (Victorian England An Introduction 4). The upper class or aristocrats usually had about 30,000 pounds of annual income, which is around 41,000 dollars in America (Victorian England An Introduction 4). Bankers and merchants made around 10,000 pounds a year magic spell the middle class including doctors made anywhere from 300 to 800 (Victoria n England An Introduction 4). Head teachers, journalists and shopkeepers who were considered to be lower class at this point in time only made 150 to 300 pounds per year (Victorian England An Introduction 4) Skilled workers and domestic staff made even less than the teachers with only 40-75 pounds a year and soldiers scraped the bottom(a) of the barrel with a grand total of 25 pounds annually and that rounds out the list (Victorian England An Introduction 4).From the late eighteenth century, class has been seen as the key to understanding modern society (Scott 1). This idea went virtually unchallenged, despite the fact that people have been arguing what defines it ever since it was introduced, until the last third of the twentieth century (Scott 1). Challenges to the class system have grown even stronger due to the fact that some have argued that social class was made extinct by the postmodern social process (Scott 1). Nevertheless some have interpreted social class to be a powerf ul and active variable today but a common factor is found in both sides of this argument (Turpin 1 and Scott 1). Both agree that the social class analysis is not thorough enough and that it should be based on more specific things than just money and gender (Scott 1 and Turpin 1). Apparently the social system wasnt perfective tense then and it isnt perfect now because it is a futile human attempt to categorize people by trivial sublunary possessions (Turpin 2).So what would it be like to live in a world where everyone is put into separate groups based on nothing more than gender, what family you were born into and how much money you make (Victorian England An Introduction 3-4)? Other than the obvious, like technology and entertainment, the same way it was in the Victorian Era, everyone would be separated into groups by things that dont necessarily numerate and that wouldnt change until someone questioned it (Victorian England An Introduction 3-4 and Scott 1).