Monday, April 1, 2019
Traditional Versus Lean Project Management Techniques Information Technology Essay
Traditional Versus  prevail  abide  worry Techniques In representation Technology EssayProject  counselling is a structured approach towards managing  jumps. It is defined as The application of  noesis skills, tools and the  proficiencys to  sick activities in order to meet stakeholders  ask and expectations from a  escort (Burke, 2003). The project  forethought  team up is responsible for finding methods of meeting the  contain budgets and schedule rather than justifications for  non meeting them (Ballard and Howell, 1997). Developing a  in full integrated information and control  musical arrangement to plan, instruct, monitor and control  large-scale data amounts, quickly and accurately for occupation solving and decision  qualification  volition determine the success of the  handler. Projects  argon temporary  harvestingion  trunks.  fruit is defined as  aiming and making things. Designing and making something for the  inaugural  succession is done  by dint of a project, which is    arguably the fundamental form of  crossingion system. Three fundamental goals of  business systems  ar (Ballard and Howell, 2003) Deliver the  growthMaximize  priseMinimize  dispel slope Project  managementPerformance improvement for  agonistical advantage is a  habitual  attri furthither of practitioners in most industries (Porter, 1985). In project management for satisfactory  transaction the consideration of time, cost and  tonicity is not adequate. Performance is described in terms of attaining  place in effect and efficiently where effectiveness is  exploit  determine of  take whereas,  energy refers to minimising or elimination non  survey-adding items in  issue.Beside a  period, dont  thriftlessness water, even in a forest,dont waste firewood.  Chinese ProverbThe systems those argon structured to deliver the product while maximizing value and minimizing waste, are said to be  angle projects (Ballard and Howell, 2003).  play is the term originally coined in 1990 by Womack, Jon   es and Roos to describe the Toyota Production  system of rules (Reeves, 2007). A production system which was capable of producing more and better vehicles in  little time, less  berth and using fewer labour hours was  disposed(p) the name  persist. Organizations  evoke  sicken project timelines and costs by eliminating waste and  centreing on value creation for the  customer. The bottom line with  black market is if the action does not  admit value to the end  guest then it is waste. persist refers to a general way of thinking and  detail practices that emphasize less of everything  fewer people, less time, lower costs (Reeves, 2007).  joust project management has been constructed by  draft copy together two approaches management of projects and  break away production. For project management  carrying into action improvement, the management of project focuses on meeting  guest  involve effectively while  tippytoe production aims at meeting customer needs efficiently utilised in lean    project management. The justification of lean production with management of project is done at the methodological  take (Horman and Kenley). function Project  perplexity MethodologyManagement of Projects Methodology break away Production MethodologyFigure 1 Generation of  melt down Project Management MethodologyFig. 1 Generation of Lean Project Management MethodologyLean product  vexment helps improve a comp whatsoevers competitive advantage. Its application in the  railcar industry has brought signifi rearce  fareance improvement.  only this does not mean that lean production is applicable to only automobile industry. Many non manufacturing companies like the one those are involved in product  teaching, transportation, accounting, hospital, sales, administration, vehicle repair and many others are making use of the lean principles. There are five traditional lean principles that are applicable outside the automobile industry (Womack and Jones, 2003) value to the customervalue stre   am to provide the product or service that the customer valuesunseamed  melt down of the product or servicepull mode- provide the customer with the product or service in a timely  moldperfection for continuous improvementTraditional versus Lean Project Management TechniquesLean project management differs from traditional project management in the goals it pursues, the structure of its  physiques, the relationship between phases and the participants in each phase.The traditional production methodology manages conversion of an input to an output. Lean production is managing the production  answer by converting input to output, by minimising the input  head for the hills waste and maximising the value of the output efficiently. Thus the lean production methodology has flow management and management of value in addition to the input, conversion and output of the conventional project management technique.The traditional approach focuses on efficiency rather than value, whereas in lean pro   duction the focus is on minimising waste (efficiency) and maximising value of output (effectiveness).Under lean production with the  insane asylum of the notion of value, effectiveness is expanded. In the traditional approach, value is not  moderaten much importance. Customers requirements are compromised which extends barely further than market requirements and lowering costs. Lean production emphasises on maximising the value of output by  fulfil the customers specific requirements.The  alternate in the production management from conventional to lean production management is becauseInappropriate control mechanisms and performance improvement efforts are used in conventional methodology.Poorly understood and addressed quality under traditional method.These show poor efficiency and effectiveness in the production  growth which roots from inadequate understanding of the production process. The change in production method from traditional to lean was to add to the  subsisting approach    and make it more appropriate for contemporary and complex production systems.Lean Product DevelopmentLean product  exploitation encompasses  many inter-related techniques. The  basic technique is supplier involvement. Instead of  cosmos involved for  expatiate  aspiration specification, suppliers are involved from the beginning of a new product. Since it is the  province of the suppliers to develop complete modules for the product, often without  detai conduct specifications, black box  engineer is used.Second technique is simultaneous  plan which means performing  several(predicate) activities parallely in the development effort. Parallel development helps reduce time.Another technique is the use of cross-functional teams which consists of members from  various functional areas in the company, to facilitate the development of products that are easy to manufacture and assemble. This technique aims at integrating rather than  arrange all the functional aspects in the product from th   e beginning. When  separates work together to develop a new product, the physical proximity that arises results in the team being integrated.To improve communication, create stronger commitment towards the project and bringing focus for cross-functional problem solving, one should use the heavyweight team structure where the project manager has direct access to and is responsible for the work of all those involved. Instead of  flesh out specifications because of visions and objectives the whole project is straegically managed.Even though a company implements these techniques, it does not  get lean product development in a  candid way, for successful lean product development the company has to approach these  co-ordinated techniques as a whole.Techniques other than Lean Product DevelopmentLean is a continuous process improvement technique that can be used to evaluate, analyze and improve how a company delivers values to its customers.  even this is only one of the several approaches,    some other techniques are  sestet sigma and theory of constraints (TOC). Lean focuses on the flow of value to a companys customers whereas six sigma focuses on individual problems, which shows the companys ability to satisfy the customers needs and TOC focuses on the constraints and how to  minify those to improve the volume of throughput within a system. Another technique is lean six sigma  which combines the analytical tools of six sigma with the speed and customer value focus of lean to optimize the improvement process. For companies undertaking continuous improvement initiative, it is  most-valuable for them to first determine the goal, and then apply the appropriate method to achieve the goal.Lean Project Delivery SystemTheoretical and practical investigations led to the emergence of the Lean Project Delivery System emerged in 2000. It is in the process of on-going development through experimentation. The job of the project  speech communication system is not only fulfilling t   he customer needs, but  in any case help the customer decide their needs. It is necessary to understand the customers purpose and constraints, exposure of customer to  alternative means for accomplishing their purposes and help them understand the end results of their desires.The lean project  speech communication system model consists of four phases Project Definiton, Lean Design, Lean  deliver and Lean Assembly. The four phases are a set of interconnecting triads, where some downstream activity takes place from the subsequent phase in each triad. adaptation  DecommissioningCommissioningFabrication  LogisticsProduct DesignDesign ConceptsPurposesDetailed engineeringDesign CriteriaOperation  MaintenanceInstallationProcess Design use of goods and servicesLean AssemblyLean SupplyProject DefinitionLean DesignWork StructuringProduction Control teaching LoopsFig. 2 Lean Project Delivery System.Project DefinitionProject  description is the first phase in project delivery system which consi   sts of determining the purposes (customer and stakeholder purposes and values),  normal criteria for translating those purposes for both product and process, and design concepts against which purposes and criteria can be tested and developed. The  performance through these three need not follow any specific sequence, although the logical starting point seems to be the purpose.To reveal to stakeholders the consequences of their needs and different value generation possibilities, the cycle through these three modules is necessary. The involvement of stakeholders is a must for the best outcome from the project definition phase. Typical stakeholders can be the client (holds the contract), users of the facility, governing agencies, designers, installers, operators, fabricators,  etc. The Lean Design phase should be launched only  afterwards bringing the three modules of project definition into alignment. (Project Definition Process Appendix 1)Lean DesignThe alignment of values, concepts    and criteria is the  provide between Project Definition and Lean Design. At the functional systems level,  growing and aligning product and process design can  trio towards Lean Design. If at all the search for value reveals opportunities that are consistent with customer and stakeholder constraints, the project  may go back to Project Definition stage. In order to allow more time for developing and exploring alternatives, the decisions are deferred consistently until the last responsible moment. This differentiates the Lean Design from the traditional practice of selecting options and  performance design tasks as soon as possible causing  work on and disruption because of conflicts in decisions made by specialists.Lean SupplyLean Supply consists of detailed engineering, fabrication, and delivery. To know what to detail and fabricate, and when to deliver the components, the system requires  obligatory product and process design. Also Lean Supply helps reduce the lead time for inform   ation and materials.Lean AssemblyLean Assembly begins with the delivery of materials and the relevant information for their installation. When the client has beneficial use of the facility, which typically occurs after commissioning and start-up the assembly completes.Comparison of Lean and Non-Lean Project Delivery SystemLeanNon-LeanFocuses on production systemFocuses on transactions and contractsTransformation, flow and value goalsTransformation goalDownstream players involved in  upriver decisionsSequential decisions by specialists thrown over the wallProduct and process designed togetherProcess design begins after product design is completeConsiders all product life cycle stages in designNot all product life cycle stages are consideredActivities performed at last momentActivities performed as soon as possible organized efforts to reduce supply-chain lead timesSeparate  systems link together through the market and take what the market offersIncorporates learning into project, fir   m and supply-chain managementLearning occurs periodicallyStakeholders interests alignedStakeholders interests not alignedSized buffers located to perform their function of absorbing system variabilitySized buffers located for  local anaesthetic optimization-(Ballard and Howell, 2003)The Difficult Path to Lean Product DevelopmentLean product development is not an easy thing to do. Several factors can hinder attempts to achieve lean product development. The different factors areCross-functional team is a technique that helps an organization in lean product development. They  baron be having a positive impact on the development effort, but creating cross-functional teams is a difficult task. Even today development is regarded to be a task for the Research and Development  plane section, this shows lack of cross-funtional focus in the organization which ultimately leads to difficulty in creating cross-funtional integration.Simultaneous engineering is another technique towards lean produ   ct development, but working with concurrent activities and thus  coincide phases in the development effort is a very complicated task. It is impsossible for the individual engineers to perform simultaneous activities.Coordination of the lean product development effort is not an easy task. For coordination, regular meetings with the whole group needs to be held which is a time consuming activity. If the size of the group is large it resulted in  long-dated meetings with repeated discussions and it may also happen that individuals from one department may find it difficult to understand discussions on issues on other department than the one he is from.Organizations face difficulty in coordinating a visionary-led development project, where visions also create problems. Requesting for detailed design specifications disturb the visionary-led projects.For any project, the suppliers must be involved from the beginning of he project, which results in difficulties for the suppliers to give de   tailed estimate of costs demanded by the top management. The desire to  fool the flexibility of black box engineering and known cost of the detailed estimate approach, obstructs a lean process.Hindering factors are more  comfortably identified. Other than the hindering factors in the process of implementing lean product development, there are some supporting factors, which helps in the implementation of lean product development (Appendix 2)BenefitsDespite lean being originated in manufacturing, it is now  apply in many other business areas including product development, administration, accounting, project management and many others, because of its generic approach of eliminating waste to create more value for customer. A variety of lean product development techniques when applied to project management can reduce project timelines,  profit customer value and reduce costs. Some other benefits of lean project management are, it helps increase the productivity, higher quality products,    reduction in order processing errors, etc.ConclusionAn alternative method to project management is lean project management. The lean approach to project management has worked successfully in potentially difficult and complex areas. The approach contributes to project management performance by focusing on the effectiveness and efficiency of delivering value that is satisfying client needs. Its implementation offers the potential for faster product development with fewer engineering hours, improved manufacturability of products, higher quality products, fewer production start-up problems, and faster time to market.Lean implementations have also yielded improvements in the value generated for clients, users and producers, and also a reduction in waste, including waiting time for resources, process cycle times, inventories, defects and errors, and accidents. It also led to a high level of commitment and motivation from the team, and to the  pleasure of the client organization. Lean thin   king when paired with an appropriate agile development methodology can provide significant benefits to an organization. It has the advantage of reducing  jeopardize to the client, with the right balance of quality, performance and value for money.Lean product development is the beginning of the journey of continuous improvement. Lean techniques are not  exclusively management tools but rather they embody a culture that needs to be enforced from the top leadership down throughout the company.  magisterial implementation of lean in all areas of project management will yield benefits that other improvement methods cannot.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment