'Management course paper\r'

'Roger and Roethlisberger state in their highly acclaimed condition â€Å"Barriers and gateway to Communication” that one of the major barriers effecting social communicating between two human beings is the appraising(prenominal) nature of Human Beings. In a regular inter personal communication between two unmarrieds each person tries to appreciate the attitude of the accessory towards oneself. Furtherto a greater extent each party looks for signs of negative wisdom about oneself in the eyes of the accomplice at the same time passing negative sound judgement about the partner. So essentially an item-by-itemistic analyzes the communication to determine the answers to following questions;\r\nWhat is his/her attitude towards me?\r\nWhat does he/she intend about me and my opinion and ideas? What do I echo about him/her (What kind of a person is he?)? then in the process of finding answers to these questions population tend to miss out the main   accuses and the true(p) up meaning of what the partner is trying to as accredited. This situation leads to  misconstrue and the communication turns into an argument which may come on  miss into a verbal war.\r\nRoger and Roethlisberger propose that ready audience helps to make the communication effective. Active hearing message that a person must be adapted to understand what exactly his/her partner is trying to formulate? This can be achieved when one understands the emotions and feelings of the partner and digs the partner’s words as the partner perceives them. Thus in a communication each individual must restate their partners words to their partners satis positionion, this ensures that the person gets the true meaning of his partners statements.\r\nPerceiving the others indite of mind is only execut adequate when one checks his tendency to [1] evaluate, thus effective auditory modality is not an easy task in fact it is a skill w hich has to be gradually developed. Roger and Roethlisberger further propose that when social communication takes place at a multitude level it becomes difficult to perceive the opponents frame of mind so victimisation a mediator who restates the statements of each person or group helps to solve the puzzle. When an individual knows that his statements are being restated to his ecstasy and the fact that he is being understood mollifies him, he in turn tries to understand what his opponent wants to say? And the communication progresses effectively and a solution to the  job in discussion is easily achieved.\r\nAnswer to straits 2\r\nThe process of diligent listening in an interpersonal communication requires that an individual empathies with the partner. This is accomplished by perceiving the world as perceived by the partner, further involving oneself in the frame of reference of another individual may lead to unwanted outcomes. The following is a list of unwanted possibilities that may occur ascribable to extreme empathy.\r\nA person may set down to appreciate others ideas over his own. His priorities may be replaced by someone else’s. An individual may loose his personal identity and his personality may be altered. He may be manipulated by the person he is empathizing with or other people may  perceive he is being manipulated or is domesticateing under someone’s influence. Because of these reasons people tend to be hydrophobic of active listening, furthermore active listening is feasible only when both the parties engaging in an interpersonal communication are willing to implement the techniques of active listening. In drive only one individual practices active listening while the other continues in an argumentative mode then the individual who is using active listening may be disapprove in doing so and may resort to  subscribe an argumentative approach.\r\nThe fear of active listening is more apparent in real life work environment. In an organization every individual is accountable to their immediate boss and is responsible for(p) for their immediate  dependants. The jitney looks at all things from a broader perspective and is responsible for activities of all his orders, thus he has to make sure that the hold out that is delegated to him synchronizes closely with other organizational function in the process of achieving the organizational objective. A subordinate on the other hand works on a narrower perspective and is only responsible for the production line allotted to him or the team to which he belongs, so a subordinate is only concerned with the job that he faces in the process of accomplishing his task.\r\nIn an interpersonal communication between the conductor and a subordinate the director stands the risk of loosing his priorities if he applies active listening. allow us consider a factual case w here a group of laborers present their problems to a manager who is genuinely concerned about his subordinates as well as the company as a whole. If the manager gets totally convoluted in his perception of the subordinates frame of reference then he looses his perspective and begins to evaluate the situation from a narrower perspective in doing so he forgets to analyze the situation from the organizational point of view and rather takes works on the problem at a personal level.\r\nThus active listening is best practiced when the manager is able of using the technique without getting deeply involved in subordinate’s frame of reference. Managers who successfully employ active listening are able to make their subordinates feel good and this also helps in motivating the subordinates, furthermore managers who practice active listening are capable of gaining their subordinates trust and respect. (Roger & Roethlisberger)\r\n[1] Roger and Roethlisberg er (Barriers and Gateway to communication 1991)\r\n \r\n'