Social, Moral, and Political Philosophy Essay Example for Free

Social, honourable, and Political Philosophy EssayIntroduction Social, moral, and political philosophies are 3 branches that share elements, unless are different in application. This paper considers what the handle have in common, how they are different, and how they apply to innovational life. When thinkers contemplate such diverse ideas such as in effect(p)ice, love, friendship, democracy, and divorce, they are considering concepts that fit in one or more of the three areas of philosophical system discussed in this paper. Contrasts and Commonality.When school of thought addresses questions of values on that point are three branches that work as agents in the effort accessible, moral, and political philosophy. Though there is plenty of overlap with the basal concerns of each branch, there is also sufficient difference in their aim. In some courtships the three mentioned fields of philosophy share elements so much that it is easy to conf affair them, and yet, in some case they are so different as to ask completely different questions almost the same circumstances.Social philosophy addresses questions of party and its institutions concerned especially with determining the features of the ideal or trump out society (Moore Bruder, 2004). The primary terrain of societal philosophy is the exterior of human beings and how it interacts with collectives and the systems created by the collectives. How humans relate to each other, how they collect into organizations, and how those organizations can shell be configured these are the questions for social philosophy. virtuous philosophy (ethics) is the philosophical study of moral judgments that chance upon what is of virtue, just, morally right, good, and also the opposite of each of those concepts. One of the aims of contemporary moral philosophy is to discover some method or style of argument that can help people resolve moral disagreements (Landesman, 2000). Moral philosophy searches the inte rior of humanity and seeks answers to questions of right and wrong. Pressing questions for moral philosophy ask individuals to affirm or deny abortion, capital punishment, polygamy, illicit drug use, and prostitution.Political philosophy concerns itself with the nature of the state and seeks to assess its confession and proper organization (Moore Bruder, 2004). Rather than seeking the answers to what is moral, right, or just, political philosophy considers which structure works best for the ordering of society, and who should rule within that structure. For example, according to Plato aristocracy is a preferred solve of presidency that is control by a philosopher-king (Moore Bruder, 2004, pg. 311). Each of the mentioned branches of philosophy expresses the values that construct the conditions for human life.A healthy, viable society is erected not only by steel and mortar, but also by social mores, concepts of proper interactions, and systems for vetting form _or_ system of g overnment ideas to govern behavior. Social and moral philosophy ask what is right and just with our social institutions, with the expectation that the perfective aspect society is realistically obtainable. Moral and political philosophy work together to first set the knowledgeability for describing the optimal good, and then creating the rationale and methodology for ordering the thoughts, ideas, and justification for state organization and action.The Differences While there is overlap between social, moral, and political philosophy, there are also points where they depart from each other to get out ideological territory. The thing that differentiates each of the mentioned areas of philosophy can be determined by the angle taken on a question. As an example, consider an unmarried couple that has premarital intimate relations that results in a pregnancy. Social philosophy would ask what the couple should do that would result in the best social relations, with the best net effect f or society overall.Moral philosophy would search their options and ask if abortion, out-of-wedlock birth, and premarital energize are right or wrong. Political philosophy would ask what laws should be created to enforce the best interests of the state. Applications for new-fangled Life In modern life there are plenty of opportunities to apply social, moral, and political philosophy. argue the vexing and ongoing war in Iraq. The war started with a new political theory that was dubbed the scrubbing school of thought, named after death chair George W. Bush.For the first time in American history the country was signaling to the innovation that preemptive aggression against countries thought to threaten American interest was acceptable. The idea of attacking other countries originally they attacked first had previously been viewed as contradictory to the essential political tradition in America. Traditional American political philosophy going back to the earliest leaders was near ly isolationist and firmly against needlessly meddling in international strife. Everything changed with the Bush doctrine.Social philosophy considers life in America and Iraq as a result of the war. What type of society would be best in a post-war Iraq? How can the deeply divisive war be moderated in America between individuals who support and oppose the war? Moral philosophy wonders about the rightness of attacking people when they have not been aggressive first about equivalency of murder and so-called collateral damage, a euphemism for accidental killing of non-combatants and whether Americans soldiers who fight in Iraq are just warriors fighting for virtuous aims or improper agents of injustice.Political philosophy would strike to the heart of how the decision for the join States to engage in preemptive war should be decided. In a famous quote President Bush announced to the American public Im the decider. However, the democratic republic and constitutional form of government actually rests the declaration of war in the domain of sexual intercourse. Founders of American government purposefully isolated the system into three branches in an attempt to create checks and balances.With the actions of President Bush, one would need political philosophy to reason through the ambiguous local of war powers used amongst the three branches of government. If the president is able to use a personal philosophy in order to commit the American military to a long-run war, then the form of government would seem to be aristocracy. If Congress were to use their authority to prevent the doctrine of preemptive war from prevailing, then the form of government would seem to be a republic.If the president and Congress were to observe the polls that reveal a majority of Americans disapprove of the war, and act upon public opinion, the form of government would be democracy. Conclusion Though social, moral, and political philosophies share common elements, they contrast each oth er by the questions they consider in given circumstances. Social philosophy questions what is best between humans and their collectives. Moral philosophy seeks determinations of right and wrong, justice and injustice, virtue and dishonor. Political philosophy ponders the best way to organize the State.Each field of philosophy shares the net effect of creating structure for how humans exist, behave, and live together. However, the fields differ in that they tighten in on instance on the experiential nature of human interaction, in another case on abstract concept of rightness, and in another case on the physical structure of the State. Landesman, C. (Winter 2000). depose Moral Philosophy Teach Us Anything?. Academic Questions, 14, 1. p. 50. Retrieved April 08, 2008, from General OneFile via Gale http//find. galegroup. com/itx/start. do? prodId=ITOF.